The Physical Impossibility of Graduation in the Mind of Someone Enrolled

It is hard to believe that three years ago this time, I was just starting my Yale experience as a freshman. Now, my little sister is starting school - at Carleton - and I'm getting ready to finish. That's a scary thought indeed. Before we cross that frightful threshold out of the ivory tower come May, however, I have a few more credits and quite a lot more courses that I will take along the way. Let's explore!

I've been catalog-browsing and will begin going to courses proper tomorrow. Shopping period at Yale is a magical, mystical thing. I have been writing about it on and off since before I set foot on campus. When I first got here, I was bursting with excitement about the many classes to choose from, and it's still a delight to me, for all the stresses that it might produce.

I traded my four-day weekends of freshman fall for 5-days-a-week Chinese sophomore fall, but that hasn't stopped me from a huge amount of intellectual adventuring. While I've taken some lumps and developed some degree of cynicism since, I still very much love Yale and love being here. Classes are a big part of that, especially once I figured out that you didn't have to take lectures as a Political Science major unless you really wanted to. (I don't, so I don't).

This post is meant principally to talk about the classes that I'm looking at this semester - though, apologies, I can't help it if I start to wax nostalgic and teary-eyed looking back on three years of the collegiate experience.

Onwards!

These pictures should convey a sense of what my shopping looks like. I have a large roster of classes that I would like, but can only reasonably take about five of them. This fact, and my past abuses / excesses, mean that I am theoretically only 5 credits (or one semester) away from graduating. But, because I have a lot of classes not strictly speaking in my major, graduating a semester early would be a terrible strain.

Plus, I like Yale so much that it's worth stomaching thousands and thousands (...and thousands) of dollars to be there another semester. I hope.

The smaller photo gives a sense of the layout of my week; that shows the 18 classes that are "most likely" to be shopped, adjusted for schedule conflicts. If seminars let out early, there are other classes that I would like to attend to investigate for future study, or curiosity, or whatever. A separate page has a lot of classes that I might like to stop in sometime to hear -- a particularly good lecture can be fun to listen to, even if I wouldn't want to be stuck in the class for 13 weeks.

I pre-registered for State-Building, with Keith Darden, and Language & Ethnic Conflict in the Balkans with Robert Greenberg. This is because I know from first hand experience that both are awesome professors, and both courses deal with fascinating subjects, from different angles. More on these later. I am shopping approximately 15 other Political Science / International Studies / Ethics, Politics, Economics style courses as well; all tend to be similarly interesting to me.

I have to be careful to try not to take too many in Political Philosophy since I need to diversify my classes, as it were, for my major. This is a kind of confusing process because the course divisions for PLSC are only listed on certain secret websites. You can guess by course numbers, but not always. This is because there are more total courses taught over the record keeping period than there are course numbers. This means there are numerous repeats in the class range from 100 to 499... lot of Poli Sci courses indeed!

What will I shop, if not seriously try to get into? Some samples:

PLSC or its Social Scientific cousins:

  • Democracy & Constitutionalism
  • U.S. Party Formation
  • Public Opinion in China
  • Means and Ends in Politics
  • American Founding Debates
  • Moral Capital and International Politics
  • Gypsies, Tramps, and Thieves

Outside PLSC:
  • Direction of Time (Exploration into the nature of time, some philosophy of physics here)
  • Language and Computation

All in all, it should be a fun week. As a senior, my schedule is not due until 5 pm the 15th. That means I have 2 full weeks of classes to shop, though in most cases, I would never take a class unless I went to a meeting of it, which means going to the first class for seminars. This limits total shoppability, but extensive syllabus stalking and preparatory work ensures that the best decisions are made. The best laid plans still go awry, as has happened to me in past semesters.

I think that things will go well, and will report to you, my dutiful Internet Public, the results of shopping period...

Any questions always welcome, happy to help enlighten those poor unlucky souls who are still long-time readers or found their way here by search engine.


Posted
 

A Quick Read on MBAs

I normally take a pretty dim view of MBAs as part of a larger ecosystem of problematic degrees and career trajectories.

However, rather than elaborating on my own views today, I wanted to share an interesting article from the Atlantic from 2006. (via HackerNews). It is by a philosopher-turned-consultant-turned-philosopher, and it essentially argues that management theory is a "long neglected subdiscipline of philosophy." How? Read on!

Comments welcome.

During the seven years that I worked as a management consultant, I spent a lot of time trying to look older than I was. I became pretty good at furrowing my brow and putting on somber expressions. Those who saw through my disguise assumed I made up for my youth with a fabulous education in management. They were wrong about that. I don’t have an M.B.A. I have a doctoral degree in philosophy—nineteenth-century German philosophy, to be precise. Before I took a job telling managers of large corporations things that they arguably should have known already, my work experience was limited to part-time gigs tutoring surly undergraduates in the ways of Hegel and Nietzsche and to a handful of summer jobs, mostly in the less appetizing ends of the fast-food industry.

 ...
The strange thing about my utter lack of education in management was that it didn’t seem to matter. As a principal and founding partner of a consulting firm that eventually grew to 600 employees, I interviewed, hired, and worked alongside hundreds of business-school graduates, and the impression I formed of the M.B.A. experience was that it involved taking two years out of your life and going deeply into debt, all for the sake of learning how to keep a straight face while using phrases like “out-of-the-box thinking,” “win-win situation,” and “core competencies.” When it came to picking teammates, I generally held out higher hopes for those individuals who had used their university years to learn about something other than business administration.
...
That Taylorism and its modern variants are often just a way of putting labor in its place need hardly be stated: from the Hungarians’ point of view, the pig iron experiment was an infuriatingly obtuse way of demanding more work for less pay. That management theory represents a covert assault on capital, however, is equally true. (The Soviet five-year planning process took its inspiration directly from one of Taylor’s more ardent followers, the engineer H. L. Gantt.) Much of management theory today is in fact the consecration of class interest—not of the capitalist class, nor of labor, but of a new social group: the management class.
 ...
 
The recognition that management theory is a sadly neglected subdiscipline of philosophy began with an experience of déjà vu. As I plowed through my shelfload of bad management books, I beheld a discipline that consists mainly of unverifiable propositions and cryptic anecdotes, is rarely if ever held accountable, and produces an inordinate number of catastrophically bad writers. It was all too familiar. There are, however, at least two crucial differences between philosophers and their wayward cousins. The first and most important is that philosophers are much better at knowing what they don’t know. The second is money. In a sense, management theory is what happens to philosophers when you pay them too much.

(emphasis mine)

By the way, here's a bonus link about the problems McKinsey faced ~2001-3 as many of its top tier clients came crashing down. Interesting stuff: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_27/b3790001.htm
Posted
 

A webcam for arlo

My family set up a webcam for Arlo, our magnificently cute new puppy. Unfortunately, the video part only works on internet explorer, and I have a mac at work!!! But, I can still get snapshots which really make me day much happier -- and make me want to get home all the sooner!

Here's arlo having what looks like an after-lunch nap : )

Video-arlo_sleeping

Posted
 

A trip to Stanford!

First time there yesterday, fun with Leah and Sekhar!

Posted
 

FiveThirtyEight + Nate Silver: As Liberals Lose Hope, the White House is Losing Its Cool

The euphoric feeling among liberals in the days between the election and the inauguration seems so quaint now -- like something that happened decades ago -- but it was very tangible at the time. Conservatives, for their part, were willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt, with his approval and favoability ratings sometimes soaring into the 70s: such a post-election "bounce" had once been commonplace in the days of Eisenhower and Kennedy, but had rarely been seen in the post-Watergate era.

But Obama was never really able to capitalize on that momentum. Perhaps, in the face of the headwinds of an ever-deepening jobs crisis (far worse than his advisors had anticipated) and unrepentant Republican obstructionism (a canny, even ballsy strategy in retrospect), there was no way he really could have.

Nevertheless, I suspect that for most liberals, any real sense of progress has now been lost. Yes, the left got a good-but-not-great health care bill, a good-but-not-great stimulus package, a good-but-not-great financial reform plan: these are a formidable bounty, and Obama and the Democratic Congress worked hard for them. But they now read as a basically par-for-the-course result from a time when all the stars were aligned for the Democrats -- rather than anything predictive of a new direction, or of a more progressive future. In contrast, as should become emphatically clear on November 2nd, the reversion to the mean has been incredibly swift.

What liberals haven't had, in other words, is very many opportunities to feel good about themselves, or to feel good about the future. ... [read more]

Nate Silver expresses something I have been noticing / feeling.

: (

Posted